Peace Action
Peace Action
Practical, Positive Alternatives for Peace



Press Room
The National Network The Student Network
Publications
Friends & Allies
Site map
Search

girl

Stop U.S. Nuclear Hypocrisy

The Bush administration has recklessly proposed developing a new hydrogen bomb. This new generation of nuclear weapons has been given the innocuous sounding name of the “Reliable Replacement Warhead” (RRW). The U.S. cannot design and produce new nuclear weapons and simultaneously insist that other countries forgo nuclear capabilities.

Please write and ask your representatives and senators to oppose this plan.

We have provided a sample below to get you started, but please take a moment to put one or two sentences in your own words. Hearing individual concerns from constituents matters significantly to members of Congress.

Here are some additional points you could include:

  • A panel of eminent scientists recently found that the plutonium in our current nuclear stockpile, in which the oldest weqapons are 60 years old, will last at least 100 years, if not longer. There is no "reliability crisis".
  • In January of 2007, former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, former Defense Secretary William Perry, former Senator Sam Nunn and others wrote an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal calling for the eventual elimination of nuclear weapons as key to U.S. security. The RRW, a new nuke, would take us away from that goal.
  • The Reliable Replacement Warhead and Complex 2030 (the factory where the bomb would be built) are estimated to cost over $150 billion. This is a ridiculous amount of money to spend on a program that's not needed. We should spend that money on dismantling our current stockpile instead.
  • Though Congress has tried to ensure that the development of the RRW won't lead to a resumption of nuclear testing, the administration has refused to rule out that possibility. Also, many experts believe the military would not allow a new weapon into the U.S. arsenal if it hadn’t been tested.
  • Some supporters of the RRW claim it is the path to a smaller nuclear arsenal. They argue that once the U.S. builds this weapon, it can get rid of a large portion of the current stockpile. This argument is a red herring. There's no reason the U.S. can't reduce the current stockpile without building the RRW. Studies have shown our current weapons are perfectly reliable and in fact are certified as such every year to the President.
The international community follows the United States' lead on nuclear weapons issues. If we build new weapons, there is little incentive for other countries to give up or abandon their nuclear programs.
>>Learn More


February 09, 2010

Subject:





Honorable Representative:


We will add your signature from the information you provide.